by James Buchanan
A news article from April 2016 reports “Just 6 percent of people say they have a lot of confidence in the media, putting the news industry about equal to Congress and well below the public’s view of other institutions.”
Why do people not trust the mainstream media? Because they have an extreme liberal bias. They will hide stories that make liberals look bad, and they will pretend that rumors invented by Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton are true.
We’ve caught the liberal media lying to us about the Benghazi attack, where four Americans died, which Hillary and Obama tried to blame on a movie, rather than the repeated ignoring of desperate pleas for more security by Ambassador Christopher Stevens, who was killed by Libyan rebels, whom the Obama regime had armed.
The liberal media ran a non-stop smear campaign against Donald Trump starting in the Republican primary that continued right up to election day, including hundreds of fraudulent polls that claimed that Trump was well behind Hillary Clinton.
Now that Hillary has lost the election, the Democrat Party is desperate to change the narrative from “Americans didn’t want crooked Hillary” to “the Russians ‘hacked’ the election” and the liberal news media is repeating their accusations as if it’s the Gospel truth.
We’re already on Version 2.0 of the Russian Hacking story. The first claim was that the Russians hacked the Democrats’ e-mail, and that they were responsible for releasing all those highly embarrassing Wikileaks e-mails involving Hillary Clinton and John Podesta. The Obama regime backed up Hillary by claiming that “17 intelligence agencies” supposedly agreed that the Russians had hacked her e-mail. An article from the National Review reported “No, Hillary, 17 U.S. Intelligence Agencies Did Not Say Russia Hacked Dem E-mails..” and that only two intelligence agencies released statements that suggested the Russians might be responsible, and that no solid evidence proving the Russians hacked Hillary’s e-mail existed.
Among the Wikileaks e-mails was one that said Hillary tells one story to the public and a different story to her donors. Hillary basically admitted that e-mail was true during a debate, and claimed that she was merely doing the same thing that Abraham Lincoln had done!
John Podesta’s e-mails were even more troubling with talk about him going to satanic “spirit cooking” dinners and strange language that some police describe as pedophile code words.
Clearly, Hillary wanted to take the focus off these hacked e-mails since the content was much more damning than the question of who hacked and exposed them. So, the Democrats came up with the Russian Hacking 2.0 story, which is trying to claim that the Russians somehow hacked the election. Never mind the fact that the Michigan election was done with paper ballots and would have been impossible to hack, and that Jill Stein demanded a recount in Wisconsin and Michigan that found that the election results were all completely valid.
After various conservative and Alt-Right personalities pointed out that the recount effort discredited the “Russian hacking” story, the Obama regime produced a report claiming that Putin ordered that Russia influence the U.S. election –which of course is a painfully vague assertion and almost certainly 100 percent bull feces.
To try to make their propaganda sound more credible, Obama has abused the power of his office to force his underlings to create reports to rubber stamp his latest lies. There’s one little problem: Obama has been caught pressuring government agencies to lie for him before.
During his 2015 State of the Union address, Obama claimed that 2014 was “the hottest year ever” and he quoted alleged reports from NASA and NOAA to support that claim. An article from ClimateDepot.com notes “scientists and climate skeptics are countering that the claims of ‘hottest year’ are based on immeasurable temperature differences that are based on hundredths of a degree differences.”
“Climate Depot’s Marc Morano issued this statement: ‘There are dueling global datasets — surface temperature records and satellite records — and they disagree. The satellites show an 18 year plus global warming ‘standstill and the satellite was set up to be ‘more accurate’ than the surface records. See: Flashback: 1990 NASA Report: ‘Satellite analysis of upper atmosphere is more accurate, & should be adopted as the standard way to monitor temp change.’”
An article from RealClimateScience.com was even more damning, noting: “100% Of US Warming Is Due To NOAA Data Tampering… The problem with the NOAA graph is that it is fake data. NOAA creates the warming trend by altering the data. The NOAA raw data shows no warming over the past century…”
If Obama would lie about Global Warming and pressure NASA and NOAA into fabricating data to support his agenda, then it’s completely believable that Obama would repeat this kind of fraud and pressure intelligence agencies into generating reports that support his “Russian Hacking” conspiracy theory.
In two weeks, Donald Trump will become president, and it will be no great surprise if we find out that all the Russian hacking accusations including this latest “report” from the Obama regime were complete fabrications by the Democrat Party to draw attention away from their failures, perversions and the fact that the American public didn’t want crooked Hillary to be their president.